Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

Wednesday, 14 February 2018

For the historical record: further weird abuse from another professor of biology

+
+
+
+
Other examples of related New Data messenger shooting abuse can be found here

Tuesday, 13 February 2018

Darwin Daydreams

+

Thursday, 8 February 2018

More Heritage For Scotland on the Patrick Matthew Story



The Carse of Gowrie Sustainability Group build upon the Patrick Matthew Trail and celebratory weekend with its next initiative.

Watch this space and their Facebook page for news of the forthcoming Patrick Matthew Museum.


+

Coming Next: The Patrick Matthew Museum!

+

Wednesday, 7 February 2018

Further Misogynistic Obscene Abuse



Archived Here: http://archive.is/zBbpK

Image of comments section on the Patrick Matthew Blog: 

Patrick Matthew: Originator, Immortal Great Thinker and Proven Influencer on Natural Selection 

https://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/
























Tuesday, 6 February 2018

More On the Weirdo Cult of Wikipedia

+ +

Saturday, 3 February 2018

Bonfire of the Insanities in the last bastions of Darwin worship on Wikipedia


We are defined by what we do. Wikipedia - the world's most reliably unreliable encyclopedia - is defined  as such by what its long term prolific editors do. As are they.

SOME THINGS IN THE PAST CAN'T BE TAMED


















Outside the contorted newspeak nonsense of the weird cult of Wikipedia editors, back in the real world, my British Society of Criminology journal article was thoroughly peer reviewed by two anonymous experts in the field, and I had to edit and re-submit it accordingly. In typical neerdowell pseudo scholar style, these weird cultists refuse to publish the independently verifiable proof that it was peer reviewed. The reason they are doing this appears to be simply because they cannot bear the independently verifiable newly discovered facts in it that show Charles Darwin was a serial lying plagiariser of Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior-published conception of the theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Unable to deal with those facts and more besides they are desperately writing deliberate and malevolent falsehoods (archived here) to deny they are in a most highly respected peer reviewed scholarly journal.





Such deliberate and dishonest malevolent and malicious falsehood spreading and fact denial behaviour is not at all untypical behaviour among prolific Wikipedia editors of long standing


This is exactly why, worldwide, all university students are forbidden from citing Wikipedia unless they are referencing its editors academic wrongdoing and persistently reliable inaccuracy.  Here is the fact based independently verifiable proof that the article in question -  The hi-tech detection of Darwin’s and Wallace’s possible science fraud: Big data criminology re-writes the history of contested discovery (the article is here) - was peer reviewed (that proof is here). This published proof, freely available in the public domain, is just one among a multitude of verifiable facts prolific Wikipedia editors of long standing are desperately denying in the last throes of their credulous Darwin worshipping unscholarly and unscientific fact denial behaviour http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume-14/ cult.

Here is the editor's revisions page of the Patrick Matthew page on Wikipedia where these facts are being denied with malevolent and malicious falsehoods https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_Matthew&action=history  (archived here because the most senior of Wikipedia editors have been deleting the entire history (verifiable evidence here in their own published words) of what the one prolific Wikipedia editor of long standing, he who has been prolifically editing Wikipedia's page about me - the very same one who sent me the malicious and malevolent obscene misogynist tweet below - has published in one of their weird cultish silly Billy "chat rooms" in the public domain. Of course, what these poor fools don't realise is that on the Internet "delete never means delete". The defamatory published statements, and evidence of Wikipedia's guilt in deleting the lot, have all been archived for forthcoming action.

 More independently verifiable proof from the publication record of malicious and malevolent behaviour of Wikipedia editors, and of  published Wikipedia falsehoods, are available in this portable pdf file. And further details can be found on the relevant page on Patrick Matthew.com . Why are these fact deniers so desperately exposing their dishonesty?  Just Google "Darwin Science Fraud" - what is your first hit? Here is mine at the time of writing.
+
+



+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

Wednesday, 31 January 2018

Wikipedia is a fake news website run by a weird cult of ne'er-do-wells


As delusional as the cult of Scientology, see the hard evidence of exactly what the cult of Wikipedia is up to. Witness their punishments of members and the required grovelling of those punished. Witness the fact deletion history and other coverups as they admit deleting the evidence of what they have done on their own history pages. Witness the vile and obscene communications published by their long-standing and prolific editors. Be astounded by their delusional witch hunting, publication of fact denial malicious falsehoods, biased agenda and other gross pseudo scholarship. All these facts are as independently verifiable as the existence of fossils in the geological strata, by virtue of the fact they exist in the archived publication record. They are available on this handy portable PDF  with more details at the bottom of this page on the PatrickMatthew.com website .


  • In their own words, Wikipedia editors claim the underlying philosophy of their delusion cult is that "experts are scum" Here   (archived here)
  • Wikipedia editors plagiarise my discovery of the selfish gene myth and refuse to cite the original publication of it  (archived here)
  • Wikipedia editors caught in a live online 'veracity trap' experiment persistently deleting independently verifiable facts from the historic publication record and serially lying to claim the publication of them does not even exist: here (archived here)

+
+

Sunday, 28 January 2018

Jimmy Wales Maintains Wikipedia Editors are not Malicious or Malevolent

+


BBC journalist Zeinab Badawi hosts panel on fake news with Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, Joseph Kahn, managing editor of the New York Times, Anna Belkina, deputy chief editor of RT, and Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, chairman of the Pakistan People’s Party and son of assassinated prime minister Benazir Bhutto.



https://youtu.be/ZmOMadRHpvk?t=568

Saturday, 27 January 2018

Introducing the "Trunchbull Reflex"

When Charles Darwin brazenly lied that no naturalist / no one whatsoever had read Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of natural selection before he replicated it (see peer reviewed article on the proof here), Charles Darwin was apparently operating under "Trunchbull's Too Bad To Be Believable Reflex" (Trunchbull Reflex)


#TrunchbullReflex

+


+