Daft as a brush pseudo-scholar Darwin worshippers really don't like the newly discovered independently verifiable facts in my book because they puncture the myth-based premise (started as a self-serving proven lie by Darwin) that no naturalist read Matthew's breakthrough pre-1858 pic.twitter.com/2JNSnlvOPI— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 23, 2018
Monday, 23 April 2018
Independently verifiable facts in the historic publication record are facts and published proven lies are lies. Only an idiot or pathological liar can't tell one from another
Sunday, 22 April 2018
Friday, 20 April 2018
|Photography (c) Andy Sutton|
Following responsible drinking guidelines @AlcoResearchUK one should never drink so much of this excellent ale that resulting brain damage would change Darwin's many lies about the true originator of natural slection into deranged perceived "truth" https://t.co/QZrHPkhyRW pic.twitter.com/V0o4csLExb— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 20, 2018
See this paper Darwin worshippers.? https://t.co/Z9AVuv9vDF— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) April 20, 2018
Well, I am very sorry for you to have say that this is just the analogous intellectual bolo punch for your daft as a brush fact denial nonsense.
The sucker punch knockout is well on its way https://t.co/ID6nSzIXFJ
Monday, 16 April 2018
1st of Four Articles Coming out on the IDD Method and Darwin's and Wallace's Newly Proven Plagiarizing Science Fraud by Glory Theft
Prof Mark Griffiths & I just had peer reviewed article published.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 16, 2018
Its official, the IDD method used to prove Darwin & Wallace plagiarised Matthew is a research "method". Proven too: Dawkins did not 1st coin the term or concept "Selfish Gene". More besides: https://t.co/waIQjoe3EE pic.twitter.com/POAk6l5277
Milton Friedman always admitted - in the teeth of the false flattering claims he did - that he never coined the term "There's no such thing as a free lunch". Because there isn't. What about @RichardDawkins though https://t.co/2JaOaW4lag He never coined the term 'Selfish Gene' pic.twitter.com/DzvZcaot08— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) April 17, 2018
Saturday, 14 April 2018
Brian J Ford on Fake news.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 14, 2018
He has written on that important topic before on Darwin, the man who - contrary to the Darinite myth - did not discover macroevolution by natural selection at all - see https://t.co/OW7uDgBIDe https://t.co/5x14jao0kC
Friday, 13 April 2018
On #Dysology— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 13, 2018
Some people, having found a rock to cling to for dear intellectual life, then eat their owns brains.
Watch out pseudo scholars we are coming to get you in expert peer reviewed literature. You are our monkeys in our circus now 🐵🙈🙉🙊🐒
Thursday, 12 April 2018
#BombshellNews— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 12, 2018
Prof @DrMarkGriffiths and I have just had our peer reviewed article accepted for a distinguished journal. The topic? We'll let you know that as soon as the article is published. But I would bet my monkeys and my circus that it's going to make the national press.
The juvenile sea squirt wanders through the sea looking for a rock to cling to. On finding one, it no longer needs its brain. So it…— Marcus Chown (@marcuschown) April 12, 2018
... eats it pic.twitter.com/gwpC0d6Yz4
A wonderful explanatory analogy @DrMarkGriffiths to fathom (pun intended) those who uncritically cling to old paradigms after they have been proven to be punctured by newly discovered independently verifiable facts https://t.co/eSnFXXhsR3— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 12, 2018
Wednesday, 11 April 2018
We need to see what they say in their defence. If they deny it, then we need to see, verify, collect, present, & weigh independently verifiable evidence that supports the accusation they plagiarised. That's what I did in the Darwin, Wallace & Matthew case https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT https://t.co/TohAFN4zpR— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 11, 2018
Monday, 9 April 2018
Facts Trump Desperate Claptrap Everytime: President Donald Trump believes vaccines cause autism and some people believe Darwin and Wallace had immaculate conceptions of a prior published theory, which is now miraculously transmuted by their own wishful magical beliefs into a different theory
In his 2013 book 'Charles Darwin: Destroyer of Myths', Andrew Norman - perhaps being an unacknowledged greater expert than the experts Darwin and Wallace and a greater expert than Matthew, the originator of macroevolution by natural slection - effectively writes that he thinks they were all wrong and that Matthew (1831) - who uniquely called his bombshell breakthrough the 'natural process of selection' and which Darwin (1858) originally four-word shuffled into 'process of natural selection' in his replicating work did no such thing. Trying to come to, arguably, "covering-up" terms with the New Data, which I predicted would happen (Sutton 2014), some arguably desperate Darwinists have written down and developed their own various desperate versions of this same type of magical thinking and had it published in the Journal of the Linnean Society. Unsurprisingly, this is the journal of the very same Linnean Society that facilitated in 1858, and has thereafter supported through publications in its journal - in breach of the universally accepted Arago Ruling on priority for discovery in science - Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarising debacle of Matthew's (1831) original and prior-published discovery of macroevolution by natural selection.
This type of arguably magical thinking makes old claims that are simply the same type as those by Andrew Norman, and of many other authors some time before him. Effectively, that Matthew's and Darwin's versions of macroevolution by natural selection are fundamentally different theories. How amazing on the topic of the history of scientific discovery that these Darwinists think they actually know more about that historic topic than the world's leading experts did on it themselves at the time of their replications of Matthew's breakthrough. Surely they mislead themselves that they believe they could ever know more than Matthew, Darwin and Wallace knew themselves on this topic of their own work at the time when Darwin's and Wallace's glory-stealing plagiarism problem occurred in the 19th century. I mean, this arguably desperate revisionist behaviour is so funny you could not make it up. Someone should write a comedy play or stage-musical about it. I bet that one day they will. It's analogous in my opinion to claiming that obsessive Monty Python fans know more about the content and reason for John Cleese's Ministry of Silly Walks techniques than he knew in developing them and then carrying them out on film himself.
Meanwhile dear readers, avoiding the silly walks of these poor desperate folk...
....Here are the actual independently verifiable facts that exist like fossil evidence in the historic publication record from those who surely would know more on this matter than anyone else alive then or since - i.e. Matthew, Darwin and Wallace themselves:
On 1st January 1831 Patrick Matthew’s book: ‘On Naval Timber and Arboriculture’ (NTA) was published by two major publishers: Adam Black of Edinburgh, and Longman and Co. of London. Together, the body of NTA and its appendix, contain the first published theory of macro evolution by what Matthew called the ‘natural process of selection’. For confirmation of this claim, that Matthew was undoubtedly the first to discover and go into published print on the full concept of macroevolution by natural selection, see: Darwin (1860a), Wallace, (1879), Mayr (1982), Dempster (1996), Wainwright (2008), Cock and Forsdyke (2008), Dawkins, (2010), Rampino (2011), Ford (2011), Sutton, (2015) and Weale (2015).
When called on it in the press by Matthew in 1860, Darwin (1860) was compelled to admit that Matthew got the whole thing first; and he (Darwin) of all people, like Matthew, would have known that for a fact. For example, in the third edition of the Origin of Species, Darwin (1861, p. xiv) wrote:
‘In 1831 Mr Patrick Matthew published his work on ‘Naval Timber and Arboriculture,’ in which he gives precisely the same view on the origin of species as that (presently to be alluded to) propounded by Mr Wallace and myself…’.
For his part, Wallace (1879, p. 142) eventually admitted in a letter:
‘Mr. Matthew apprehended the theory of natural selection, as well as the existence of more obscure laws of evolution, many years in advance of Mr. Darwin and myself…’.
Independently verifiable facts such as these trump desperate claptrap every time!
For more on these facts and all supporting references to the facts in this blog see Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret
For the facts of Donald Trump's claptrap see the Healthwatch paper I co-wrote pictured below.
with Henn and Gibson Here
Darwin, C. R. (1861) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. (Third Edition) London. John Murray.
Wallace, A. R. (1879a) 9 May. Letter to Samuel Butler. Unique WCP identifier: WCP1586. Wallace Letters Online.